Skip to main content

South (1919) - a Silent Film Review


South is a documentary about Ernest Shackleton's Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition, which departed from South Georgia in 1914 to search for a passage through the South Pole. Although it was not the first time that a cameraman went on such an expedition, the first time was in 1903, South was the first long movie made of a Pole expedition.


Although the First World War had just begun, First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill gave the green light for this expedition. In order to prevent people from thinking that crew members shirk the moral duty to serve, Shackleton and his crew were put in a military uniform on departure.


Shackleton had an unconventional way of choosing his crew. He asked them one or two questions and then decided if they could join. In one case he did not ask any questions at all and took a man on because he thought he looked funny. It is therefore astonishing that all crew members survived this  failed expedition. The only ones who did not return alive were the sled dogs. Where we see cute puppies in the beginning of the film, we do not see any more dogs at the end of the trip. You can guess what happened to them.


Shackleton's ship was stuck on the ice on 19 January 1915. They hoped that the thaw in the coming spring would melt the ice and set the ship free, but the floating ice caused the ship to be crushed and on November 21, 1915, the ship would definitely disappear under the ice. Cameraman Frank Hurley filmed it. I think this is the most impressive part of the whole movie. You can imagine that the crew saw their only possibility of returning to the inhabited world disappear like snow before the sun. With some lifeboats, they continued their way to find out that they were on a large floating ice shoots. Many crew members were too weak to continue the journey and Shackleton decided to continue the journey with some crew members, including Hurley, by sea. They would later return with a rescue team to rescue the rest of the crew. Because the movie camera was too heavy to take with them, Hurley only had a photo camera. With this camera he made some color pictures.


They managed to reach land and save the survived crew members and also film some animals on the way. I'm uncertain if Hurley had bought a new camera when they landed or they went back to save the crew and that he had his own camera back there. The latter seems most likely to me because a movie camera was expensive and Hurley agreed that he would receive a percentage of the proceeds from the expedition instead of pay. So it was to his advantage to spend as little money as possible and to shoot as many images as possible. He even went so far as to jump into the freezing water to save the movie negatives when the ship made water.


South is definitely not a David Attenborough documentary and there's too little action to make it a docudrama, but you should keep in mind that Hurley, in addition to filming, was mainly busy surviving just like all other crew members. I think that even nowadays, too little is known about what a cameraman has to do if he has to make a documentary. If he has to shoot a mountain climb, we as a viewer all see what the mountaineer has to face. We do not realize that the cameraman is going through the same misery. He’s even suffering more than the subject he’s filming because he has a heavy camera and the task of filming everything.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Miss Marple - a Film Review

Agatha Christie's murder mysteries are legendary. Miss Marple and Poirot are two of her most popular creations. Over the many decades, Christie has sold more books than many other writers. Since the beginning of the film, popular books have been turned into films. I do not know exactly what was the first movie version of a successful selling book, but I can remember a film of Lewis Carroll's 'Alice in Wonderland' that was made in 1903. The first movie of a popular detective I know of is the short movie "Adventures of Sherlock Holmes" created in 1905. It is therefore amazing that it was only in 1961 that the first Miss Marple film, with the somewhat eccentric Margaret Rutherford in the title role, was made. Three other Miss Marple movies followed with Rutherford. It's hard to understand for some people, but in most cases it's necessary to change the story to make a good movie of a book. The reason for this is that a story must be told in a lim

Arsenic and old Lace (1944 and 1969) - a Film Review

Critic Mortimer Brewster finds out on his wedding day that his beloved aunts have killed a number of older men and that madness runs in his family. This is a film based on a play by Joseph Kesselring, and is filmed twice. The first movie that was made of it was shown into cinemas in 1944. This film was directed by Frank Capra with Cary Grant, Prescilla Lane, Josephine Hull, Jean Adair, Raymond Massey and Peter Lorre in the lead. In 1969 a remake was made for television with Bob Crane, Sue Lyon, Helen Hayes and Lillian Gish in the lead. I will discuss both in this review. When Capra began recording in 1941, the play is a big hit on Broadway. To not interfere with the success of the play, Warner Bros., with the producers of the play, decided that the movie will not be featured in the cinema before it ran out on Broadway. Thus it came to pass that the first performance, for the troops overseas, was shown in 1943. The following year the film was screened in the cinemas. The film i

Les petits meurtres d'Agatha Christie - a Film Review

Scene from 'Un meurtre en sommeil' In 2009, the French decided to make their own adaptations of Agatha Christie's detective stories. They do this (the series continues and the filming for the new season is to be broadcast in 2018 is being filmed as I write this) entirely in their own way. Poirot and Miss Marple have been replaced by the comic police duo Larosère and Lampion. This is not the only thing they have changed in the stories. They have changed almost everything to Christie's classics except the basics of the stories. In some episodes it was difficult for me to see which Agatha Christie story they used. Antoine Duléry in 'Je ne suis pas coupable' They also made the stories more modern. For example, inspector Lampion is gay and in one story he has to dress himself as a woman to catch the killer. Normally, I do not like this kind of dressing up because it often results in a cheap kind of humour and I just find this embarrassing. But that is