Skip to main content

Master of the House (1925) - a Silent Film Review


When a man begins to behave tyrannically to his family, the women in the household decide to teach him a lesson.


This description made me curious. But I think that this interesting subject is not used to a sufficient extent and 'Master of the House' is taking a long time to sit with it’s one hour and 51 minutes.
This Danish film opens with the announcement that this is a story about a very spoiled man, a foreign man, because in Denmark, this kind of men no longer existed, if we have to believe the title card. The Danish women got voting rights in 1917 and were determined to implement equal rights also on other fronts. Even so, this kind of men did not belong in Danish society anymore.


In a good movie there is always some tension. This can be expressed in the dialogues, but it can also be seen in the way the story is portrayed. On both sides, this movie is disappointing. It starts by calling the father a "spoiled man"on the first title card. That weakens the contrast between the father and the women in the house. It gives him an excuse for his rude behavior, because it is finally his wife's fault because she has always spoiled him.


It would also make the film more interesting if the differences between the father and the mother were greater. He behaves like a jerk, but apart from giving his son a slap, he does not do anything really bad. The mother rests in her sorrow and does whatever he wants. This lasts about half an hour and every time I wonder why I'm looking at it. Film-technical this film is also not really interesting because the changes between totals and dramatic close-ups are hardly used and action can not be seen at all, apart from a confrontation between the father and his former nanny. She is therefore the most interesting character in the film. She is a bossy and clever woman who knows how to handle such an unpleasant character. Mathilde Nielsen, who plays nanny Mads, proves with this part to be a good actress. She shows at least some emotion, all other actors seem to play the auto pilot.


Originally this was a play of the popular writer and actor Svend Rindom. Rindom has edited the story together with director Carl Theodor Dreyer into a movie scenario. 'Master of the House' was Dreyer's first major international success. This success made it possible to make his biggest masterpiece 'La Passion de Jeanne d'Arc' three years later. This became a totally different kind of film that was not successful in 1928, but now it is seen as one of the best films ever made.


Although I find the story of 'Master of the House' predictable it will always be a mystery to me why it became such a succes in 1925. But the Danes thought it was good for a remake in 1942, entitled 'Tyrannes Fald '. I have not seen this movie, but he will probably be better than the original.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Miss Marple - a Film Review

Agatha Christie's murder mysteries are legendary. Miss Marple and Poirot are two of her most popular creations. Over the many decades, Christie has sold more books than many other writers. Since the beginning of the film, popular books have been turned into films. I do not know exactly what was the first movie version of a successful selling book, but I can remember a film of Lewis Carroll's 'Alice in Wonderland' that was made in 1903. The first movie of a popular detective I know of is the short movie "Adventures of Sherlock Holmes" created in 1905. It is therefore amazing that it was only in 1961 that the first Miss Marple film, with the somewhat eccentric Margaret Rutherford in the title role, was made. Three other Miss Marple movies followed with Rutherford. It's hard to understand for some people, but in most cases it's necessary to change the story to make a good movie of a book. The reason for this is that a story must be told in a lim

Arsenic and old Lace (1944 and 1969) - a Film Review

Critic Mortimer Brewster finds out on his wedding day that his beloved aunts have killed a number of older men and that madness runs in his family. This is a film based on a play by Joseph Kesselring, and is filmed twice. The first movie that was made of it was shown into cinemas in 1944. This film was directed by Frank Capra with Cary Grant, Prescilla Lane, Josephine Hull, Jean Adair, Raymond Massey and Peter Lorre in the lead. In 1969 a remake was made for television with Bob Crane, Sue Lyon, Helen Hayes and Lillian Gish in the lead. I will discuss both in this review. When Capra began recording in 1941, the play is a big hit on Broadway. To not interfere with the success of the play, Warner Bros., with the producers of the play, decided that the movie will not be featured in the cinema before it ran out on Broadway. Thus it came to pass that the first performance, for the troops overseas, was shown in 1943. The following year the film was screened in the cinemas. The film i

Les petits meurtres d'Agatha Christie - a Film Review

Scene from 'Un meurtre en sommeil' In 2009, the French decided to make their own adaptations of Agatha Christie's detective stories. They do this (the series continues and the filming for the new season is to be broadcast in 2018 is being filmed as I write this) entirely in their own way. Poirot and Miss Marple have been replaced by the comic police duo Larosère and Lampion. This is not the only thing they have changed in the stories. They have changed almost everything to Christie's classics except the basics of the stories. In some episodes it was difficult for me to see which Agatha Christie story they used. Antoine Duléry in 'Je ne suis pas coupable' They also made the stories more modern. For example, inspector Lampion is gay and in one story he has to dress himself as a woman to catch the killer. Normally, I do not like this kind of dressing up because it often results in a cheap kind of humour and I just find this embarrassing. But that is