Skip to main content

A Caribbean Mystery - a Film Review

Joan Hickson
 

‘…and I showed him a snapshot I had with me of one of my nephews.[…] But without thinking, Major Palgrave must have put back my snapshot into his wallet and returned it to his pocket.’

Everyone has their own ideas about how the Miss Marple books should be filmed, what Miss Marple should look like and how she should behave. But I ask myself the question with every film adaptation; is it credible? If the answer to that is "yes" then as far as I am concerned the film does not have to follow the book to the letter. Take the quote here above by Miss Marple from the book "A Caribbean Mystery". Miss Marple undoubtedly learned in her youth that she should not lie, but here it serves a higher purpose so Agatha Christie makes sure that Miss Marple can lie very convincingly and at the same time remains credible. So you see that even Agatha Christie makes her creation say things that actually go against their nature.

"A Caribbean Mystery" is not my favorite Miss Marple story. I can't really explain why, but I always feel like Miss Marple is a bit like a fish out of water. It is not really that strange because she is simply taken out of her natural environment; England.

As far as I know, three adaptations have been made of "A Caribbean Mystery"; one is from 1983 with Helen Hayes in the lead, in 1989 there was the version with Joan Hickson and the last film adaptation is from 2013 and Julia McKenzie plays miss Marple in that one.

Helen Hayes

 Although I think Helen Hayes is a very acceptable Miss Marple, I have to admit that I think her version of "A Caribbean Mystery" is the least of the three. Hayes' miss Marple reminds me a bit of the more recent Miss Marple; Geraldine McEwan. Both ladies assume that Miss Marple enjoys tracking down the killer. McEwan even gives Miss Marple a twinkle in her eye. You see Hayes enjoying herself when she comes up with a ruse. But where McEwan occasionally gets sad from all the misery that a murder entails, I miss that with Hayes. As far as I'm concerned, that makes McEwan a more credible Miss Marple than Hayes.

Cassie Yates, Zakes Mokae, Swoosie Kurtz, Stephen Macht

The other older actors in the 1983 version are still good, but the younger ones are typical B television actors. Their acting is not very convincing. They exaggerate their acting too much to be taken seriously, but they exaggerate too little to make it comical. What has worked well with the Margaret Rutherford films. Unfortunately, I find the structure of the 1983 version a bit predictable. Unfortunately, quite a bit of the plot is given away in the beginning. What makes the case for this version is that a black actor has been taken for the role of doctor. Which is very credible because where the book is set in the 50s, this TV movie has moved the story to the present. Which is an understandable decision by the makers because the budgets of TV productions were not as high as those of cinema films.

Sheila Ruskin, Joan Hickson

Then I come to my most favorite version; the one with Joan Hickson from 1989. I particularly like the structure of the story. As with all Miss Marple films with Hickson, she walks around like a cool Victorian lady. What I find clever is that, although she shows little emotion, Miss Marple doesn't come across as haughty. Hickson knows how to make Miss Marple human in one way or another.
Julia McKenzie's miss Marple is a little less Victorian. Although, like McEwan, she also occasionally gets emotional, McKenzie nowhere looks as fragile as Hickson's or Hayes' miss Marple. Too bad because the fragile appearance is an important part of Miss Marple's. With this she knows how to throw sand in the eyes of many a murderer. But still I ask myself the question; is it credible? I would say; Yes. I can imagine that, given the fact that she never married, she could hold her own in her younger years. In the old Victorian days, it was important for girls to marry the best possible party. Older single ladies were frowned upon. Miss Marple must have had a strong character when she was young and when, as an older lady, she still shows this in her posture I think that is credible.

Hermione Norris, Julia McKenzie, MyAnna Buring, Montserrat Lombard

Broadly speaking, the story of the 2013 version of "A Caribbean Mystery" follows the book, but quite a few liberties have been taken and it's not just about who said what. Characters have been added that, in my opinion, wouldn’t have been necessary. Furthermore, the element of voodoo has been put into it. It does explain a thing or two, but I suspect it has been added more for effect. It gives the story more suspense and momentum, but you have to admit that Agatha Christie wrote detectives and not horror or thriller stories. On the other hand, Agatha Christie did not write comedies either, but all the same I really enjoyed the comic relief in "Les Petits Meurtres d'Agatha Christie", the French interpretation of Christie's detective stories.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Miss Marple - a Film Review

Agatha Christie's murder mysteries are legendary. Miss Marple and Poirot are two of her most popular creations. Over the many decades, Christie has sold more books than many other writers. Since the beginning of the film, popular books have been turned into films. I do not know exactly what was the first movie version of a successful selling book, but I can remember a film of Lewis Carroll's 'Alice in Wonderland' that was made in 1903. The first movie of a popular detective I know of is the short movie "Adventures of Sherlock Holmes" created in 1905. It is therefore amazing that it was only in 1961 that the first Miss Marple film, with the somewhat eccentric Margaret Rutherford in the title role, was made. Three other Miss Marple movies followed with Rutherford. It's hard to understand for some people, but in most cases it's necessary to change the story to make a good movie of a book. The reason for this is that a story must be told in a lim

Arsenic and old Lace (1944 and 1969) - a Film Review

Critic Mortimer Brewster finds out on his wedding day that his beloved aunts have killed a number of older men and that madness runs in his family. This is a film based on a play by Joseph Kesselring, and is filmed twice. The first movie that was made of it was shown into cinemas in 1944. This film was directed by Frank Capra with Cary Grant, Prescilla Lane, Josephine Hull, Jean Adair, Raymond Massey and Peter Lorre in the lead. In 1969 a remake was made for television with Bob Crane, Sue Lyon, Helen Hayes and Lillian Gish in the lead. I will discuss both in this review. When Capra began recording in 1941, the play is a big hit on Broadway. To not interfere with the success of the play, Warner Bros., with the producers of the play, decided that the movie will not be featured in the cinema before it ran out on Broadway. Thus it came to pass that the first performance, for the troops overseas, was shown in 1943. The following year the film was screened in the cinemas. The film i

Les petits meurtres d'Agatha Christie - a Film Review

Scene from 'Un meurtre en sommeil' In 2009, the French decided to make their own adaptations of Agatha Christie's detective stories. They do this (the series continues and the filming for the new season is to be broadcast in 2018 is being filmed as I write this) entirely in their own way. Poirot and Miss Marple have been replaced by the comic police duo Larosère and Lampion. This is not the only thing they have changed in the stories. They have changed almost everything to Christie's classics except the basics of the stories. In some episodes it was difficult for me to see which Agatha Christie story they used. Antoine Duléry in 'Je ne suis pas coupable' They also made the stories more modern. For example, inspector Lampion is gay and in one story he has to dress himself as a woman to catch the killer. Normally, I do not like this kind of dressing up because it often results in a cheap kind of humour and I just find this embarrassing. But that is